Draft presentation structure from Mural Board:
You can view this here : https://app.mural.co/t/introductiontodesignforperfo4905/m/introductiontodesignforperfo4905/1758713183458/5fbc41f84201b34654418af54156a48e72387bf9?sender=uad5c45d3249b3bbd713c3198
Notes after sharing this structure: tutorial feedback from Kwame Baah, Jade Gellard, Sarah Harkins and Antonella Nonnis:
- Think about making your presentation as accessible as possible
- Think about how you mitigate participant effect
- be explicit about the research and references that underpins what you have done and put references against that
- How do you counter bias – your own and the potential for bias in your sources/algorithyms
- WHAT WOULD YOU CHANGE – student centerd but also staff centerd
- response from your colleagues as research for action research
- list and name your methods – creation methods, research methods,
- How did managing your time line go?
- potentially reframing consent form and student facing documents
- visibility bias in this tool – bear in mind invisible disabilities
- do more work framing the tool and using it as a tool to talk about diversity
- talk about what effects and inspires this in your teaching of EDI
- next steps – things you can do immediately, things you can do in a year, things that you can do over a longer time period:
- start of legacy building
- is there a point where it is optimum to use this tool in the academic year?
This was a very helpful meeting and as ever, I gained a lot from the support of my tutor and group who have been incredibly supportive throughout the course. It particularly struck me that I needed to check through the accessibility of my documentation: I often print a proportion of any documents I use on buff coloured paper, and think carefully about the phrasing and clarity of the language I use, but needed to be sure that I hadn’t missed anything.
Final presentation slides:
